|
Post by bulldog on Jan 30, 2008 12:45:20 GMT 12
Hey guys, I'm getting my motor fully rebuilt and I have a question. The compression ratio the previous owner ran was 10:1 which is pretty high for the old girl and I've been informed that this is fine if I want to run av gas all the time, which I don't. I talked to the previous owner and he informed me that he ran it on 98 and it was fine although the engine guys are saying looking at the pistions there was definately detonation going on. So I have two choices, reduce the CR to 9 1/4 : 1 (reducing power and torque but be able to run on normal pump gas OR keep the 10:1 CR and good power and torque but have to run AV gas and or a mixture of all the time. I don't have a problem with av gas if this was going to be purely a race car but I'll definately be using it occasionally for general road use too.
|
|
|
Post by zep on Jan 30, 2008 13:35:27 GMT 12
reduce it. I doubt you'll notice a huge loss and av gas is ludicrously expensive / you're not alowed to fill your car up from the pump either.
Either that, or maybe your could use ocatane booster when you get some 98?
|
|
|
Post by bulldog on Jan 30, 2008 20:55:43 GMT 12
Yeah I think you're right Zep. As much as I want to make the most power I can I simply can't imagine running av gas all the time...it's just not realistic.
|
|
|
Post by gordo on Jan 31, 2008 0:04:50 GMT 12
Ah, but it's such an evocative scent ...
You may not need to worry about it, the block that ran the bearing had a negative deck clearance - the piston was higher than the deck - and a stock(ish) block will have them further down, reducing the compression, anyway. Wouldn't be a bad thing to gain a few thou' clearance as the pistons were marked as coming VERY close to the head/valves.
|
|
|
Post by jaygti on Jan 31, 2008 8:09:56 GMT 12
Either that, or maybe your could use ocatane booster when you get some 98? 90% of off-the-shelf octane boosters do sweet Barry White all, so I wouldn't even consider that option either. Just drop the CR, it'll still be plenty fast, especially compared to the 1256cc's of raw power it'll be replacing.
|
|
|
Post by bulldog on Jan 31, 2008 9:24:18 GMT 12
I've got the dyno charts from when it was together. It was 170bhp and nigh on 700nm or torque! Barry white it's gonna move along nicely.
|
|
|
Post by zep on Jan 31, 2008 9:42:19 GMT 12
Sheeeeit! Not bad. That's at the wheels? My turbo engine makes that at the fly at the moment!
|
|
|
Post by mikuni on Feb 1, 2008 19:25:23 GMT 12
I've got the dyno charts from when it was together. It was 170bhp and nigh on 700nm or torque! Barry white it's gonna move along nicely. Ignore the torque figure. They are not acurate. I don't know why but its something to do with the gear ratio or some nuts. But thats quite good power, should keep up with me Bring it to oldschool trackday ;D
|
|